I took this test. Guess who I turned out to be?


I mean, write one little series of science fiction stories about an alien species that is massively superior to humans because they embraced eugenics thousands of years ago, and suddenly you’re FIGURATIVELY HITLER.

Apparently it’s possible to break the test and have it admit you’re a perfect angel with no known historical villain counterpart. Mrs. Hatboy achieved such a score which is hardly surprising.

This has been your Wednesday fun-break.

About Hatboy

I’m not often driven to introspection or reflection, but the question does come up sometimes. The big question. So big, there’s just no containing it within the puny boundaries of a single set of punctuationary bookends. Who are these mysterious and unsung heroes of obscurity and shadow? What is their origin story? Do they have a prequel trilogy? What are their secret identities? What are their public identities, for that matter? What are their powers? Their abilities? Their haunted pasts and troubled futures? Their modus operandi? Where do they live anyway, and when? What do they do for a living? Do they really have these fantastical adventures, or is it a dazzlingly intellectual and overwrought metaphor? Or is it perhaps a smug and post-modern sort of metaphor? Is it a plain stupid metaphor, hedged around with thick wads of plausible deniability, a soap bubble of illusory plot dependent upon readers who don’t dare question it for fear of looking foolish? A flight of fancy, having dozed off in front of the television during an episode of something suitably spaceship-oriented? Do they have a quest, a handler, a mission statement, a department-level development objective in five stages? I am Hatboy. https://hatboy.blog/2013/12/17/metalude-who-are-creepy-and-hatboy/
This entry was posted in Kussa mun hopoti?, Office Posts, Random and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Godwinning

  1. aaronthepatriot says:

    I tried to be totally honest and not use wishful thinking when describing myself. I am Lenin.

    I don’t think pasting the link gives my results and in any rate I’ll put what it says to me here. I could probably try the “post to facebook” option or something but meh. Interesting. So is Lenin>Hitler? I think so. Because, you know, Hitler.

    And I think this is pretty fair, knowing me. What do you think?

    Personality Match (I thought this section was harsh but I’m in the general direction of all of it)

    Like Vladimir Lenin, you are confident in your intellectual ability and supremely driven to improve the world according to your vision – even if it means you have to steamroll those who fail to understand how your way is better. You probably think that it takes a special and unique kind of person to understand the full merit of your abilities and therefore see little reason to listen to others anyway. Our advice to you is to not be so dismissive of other people’s input – but we don’t expect that you are willing to take it.

    Words of Warning (I answered no to most of these…this was the farthest from a match, unlike the next section)

    Points to consider for people with your personality – have you ever:
    •Been so possessed by an intellectual idea that you felt it was the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, feeling that you simply had to implement it in the real world, no matter the cost? (no way)
    •Misconstrued the motives of others, believing they were out to belittle or diminish you, throwing acerbic sarcasm in their faces when all they wanted was to call your attention to their perspective as well? (a bit…I’ve improved but I have misjudged)
    •Lived so thoroughly in your head that you vacillated between binge-eating, drinking, etc. and then practically fasting? (not really…certainly not due to living in my head)
    •Construed yourself as the sole light of the world, neglecting to give credit to the people whose contributions were in some sense a prerequisite of yours? (no way)
    •Used your analytical acumen to vehemently point out the flaws and deficiencies in the doings of others, while seeing little need to state the good? (yeah, guilty)

    Scientific Research (These are prescient. Maybe one is wrong…maybe. Wow.)

    According to studies from Cambridge University (UK) and Texas AM University (US), your scores indicate that you are:

    • Likely to have a richer vocabulary than the average person.
    •Likely to be more knowledgeable than the average person on political and societal issues.
    •Likely to have a quicker understanding of abstract concepts and ideas than the average person.
    •More deliberate and thorough in your actions than the average person.
    •Someone who is more reserved in social situations than the average person.
    •Someone who has an easier time concentrating for long periods of time than the average person.
    •Someone who likes to take more time to size people up and get to know them before you open up than the average person.
    •More planful, organized, and goal-oriented than the average person.
    •Likely to have had a higher grade point average in school than the average person.
    •Less likely than the average person to ever have cheated on your homework, exams, or a loved one.
    •More likely than the average person to leave an orderly room when you go to work in the morning.
    •More critical, cold-headed, and detached than the average person.
    •More suspicious of the motives of others than the average person and quicker to detect a lie or an attempt to manipulate you than the average person.
    •More at ease with making cynical and tough decisions than the average person.
    •More likely than the average person to be barbed and acerbic with people who irritate you.

  2. dreameling says:

    I’m Albert Speer. Not quite Hitler, but still a Nazi.

    Like Albert Speer, you are intellectually minded. You see yourself as an observer of events rather than as a partaker in them – as someone who analyzes rather than influences, and thinks rather than does. However, you should remember that your detached analytical stance does not make you an innocent bystander in life and that all that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing. Passivity is also a choice that affects others.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s