Bad Cow (1)

Bad Cow is in editing, and I’m preparing to start work on the next book in the series.

Here, for the kick-off to a lazy weekend, is how the 700-800-page[1] behemoth’s word counts broke down by day.

[1] Actual page numbering depends on whether I use the same font size as The Final Fall of Man, in which case it will need to be printed on white paper instead of cream, and will be about 790 pages long; or make it in a smaller font, in which case I will be able to use the same cream paper as The Final Fall of Man, but the smaller font will make the page count about 690.

I divided the stats for Part One, Two and Three, because each one is like a little stand-alone book and otherwise the graph would have been … well, about the same really, except all one single continuous upwards squiggle.

bad_cow_metrics

Part One was a quick one to write because it was mostly written already – many, many years ago – and just needed to be polished.

Part Two was something of a drag because there was a lot of “technical” (read “mystical”) stuff in there and I struggled to bring that, and the settings and characters (which I think are strong) together into something other than just “exposition with some fun characters in interesting settings”. As intriguing as that might sound, it needs more than that to actually be a story.

Part Three turned out to be surprisingly big. About as many words as Eejit all on its own. Still, I couldn’t really release them as three separate books (pending editorial feedback), because they don’t really stand alone. And I certainly couldn’t afford three covers at this stage. Well, I could, but I’d rather just have one.

There aren’t any other stats, because the chapter-structure here isn’t set up to list the character point-of-view as a facet.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Oræl Rides To War and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Bad Cow (1)

  1. dreameling says:

    As one of your editors, I need to point out that you’re missing a closing bracket after “(read “mystical””.

  2. brknwntr says:

    Also he wrote “word count” where it should have been “paage count.”

    Also, paage count.

  3. stchucky says:

    Thank you both. I want to say “just testing”, but the truth is I was in a hideous hurry and this is exactly what editors are for. Well played.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s