There’s been a bit of a flurry about the Hugo Awards lately, and as a nominee (*snicker*) I suppose I should take a look at it.

So this was the first thing I saw on my news feed this morning, and so I took some time to read it and check out some connected stories and basically read up on this thing I had not heard about and really couldn’t give less of a fuck about, because I’ve been more interested in actually writing books these past few months. Which maybe these twats should do as well, regardless of their skin colour, gender or sexual orientation.

And this was the first thing I thought:

Oh, so this is good news for the white male author, huzzah! Finally we get a break and justice prevails, we’ve had a hard time for far too long.

Not really, but whatever. The whole idea seemed immediately dubious to me, just like any agenda-based attempt to sway public opinion or readership, viewership or sales of any kind. It’s interference, and I can’t think of many examples in which interference is a good thing. Ever.

My second thought, on seeing the #GamerGate thing dragged back into the spotlight like a flyblown carcass and that the Rabid Puppies were involved here too, was:

Enh, this is just a limelight-grab. More of the same bullshit, and now it’s going to ruin books as well as video games. Good job, idiots.

Then, as I read about the votes and the wins last year, and the shortlist nominations and driving factors of this year’s crop, it all got very strange, and murky, and confusing. This, for example, is the explanation from one of “the big bads” of this whole brouhaha. He sounds awful.

See, the whole idea behind “gaming the system” here is that it’s very easy to become a nominator / voter for the Hugos. You need a $40 WorldCon membership, and that’s about it. I mean, that’s how I got my nomination. And so the plan is to get the attention of as many people as possible, some percentage of whom will get riled up enough to pay $40 to get themselves a vote, and cast it in the activist – or reactivist – direction.

All basically legal, and fine and fair. It’s essentially your classic election campaign. The only difference being that people pay to vote. But “paying to vote” isn’t the problem here – it’s “convincing ill-informed people to pay to vote for an agenda they probably don’t understand and which has nothing to do with science-fiction and fantasy books.”

Part of my initial confusion was that I thought the Sad Puppies were the liberal guys trying to game the system to get more diversity onto the ballot, but it seems as though they’re actually the right-wing conservative ones trying to keep The Man in charge. Well, whatever.

I mean, let’s not get silly. I knew I was never really in with a chance at the short list, because hardly anyone’s even heard of my books. Still, a nomination was a fun thing to brag about and it’s a fact, meaningless though it is – I can put it on my book covers. I just want to be clear, I’m not questioning the short-list process out of any idea that it’s not fair to me, and that if things had been done differently I might have been in with a shot. This isn’t sour grapes talking. Not this time.

If anything, indeed, this unfair lashback would improve my chances … right? I guess I have a fairly female-hero-heavy narrative going on, quite by chance, but I’m a white guy and I write intentionally classical sci-fi with a good mix of genders. There are actually considerably more male heroes than female in The Final Fall of Man[1]. It might just seem that the girls get a better showing because females are so under-represented in the genre. I don’t know. The point is, the right-wing swashbuckler party should be all over me like yeehaw on a redneck.

[1] I’ve also intentionally avoided assigning skin colours to the human characters. Glomulus Cratch is pale and blonde because he is borderline albino, but the rest I have always thought of as sort of neutrally coffee-coloured and dark-haired, a result of long-term post-Earth intermingling, advancement and adaptation to different planetary environments. It doesn’t really matter. You can imagine them as any skin colour you like. Janya Adeneo is described as pale, and Waffa has greying blonde hair, but those features can still go with any skin tone.

Anyway, the point is, I should be behind this move. It’s only good for me.

And yet, fuck this move. Let’s get some diversity in there. George RR Martin seemed to come down on the side of the progressives too, even though he is equally in the old white male establishment camp and stands to “lose” from any increased liberalism. And that’s good enough for me.

As soon as I read about their methods, I have to say I became sceptical:

For the last three years, Correia has led a small but vocal anti-progressive campaign called Sad Puppies in an attempt to game the Hugos by mobilizing people to vote for its preferred choices. The secret of the awards is that they’re actually very susceptible to manipulation—it costs just $40 for a supporting membership that gives one voting rights. Low participation, paired with the sheer breadth of eligible work, means nominees can get onto the ballot with as few as 50 nominations. After failing to move the needle the first year, Sad Puppies organized around another slate of candidates and garnered an additional 70 or so votes last year to edge a few of their chosen authors onto the ballot. The overall voting membership wasn’t impressed with these choices, and awarded other work in every category. But this year, Sad Puppies, buoyed by Beale’s more extreme, Gamergate-affiliated campaign Rabid Puppies, managed to secure the extra votes needed to dominate the nominations. The result? They managed to push out those seeking to make the Hugos more representative of the diverse works within the genre.

Will I become a minority sometime, and get a movement behind me to righteously bolster my claims and boost my publicity, without it making me look like a black-hatin’, woman-beatin’, gay-killin’ Nazi? Maybe.

Doesn’t matter. Everybody is a minority of one. My utopian end-game here is for every one of us to be a singular entity, without recourse to popular activism. Only then will our stories stand on their own merits, free of political and socio-cultural agenda.

So we’d better make ’em good stories, right?

Excuse me, I have more important shit to do.

This entry was posted in Hatboy's Nuggets of Crispy-Fried Wisdom and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Hugo

  1. thelinza says:


    Also, your books only have more male heroes than female heroes, for certain definitions of ‘hero.’ One of those males is a plant psychologist, two of them are basically villains, and the computer doesn’t really have a gender, in spite of having a male name. Plus the Drednanth– hot damn. That’s a pretty cool hero right there. Throwing herself into space to hedge the survival of her species? That counts for like 3 heroes at least.

    • stchucky says:

      Well thanks! I do appreciate the vote of confidence, and of course I have to agree. By action and definition, the ladies of the Tramp (heh) are generally the more hero-ey.

      Honesty and nitpickery compels me to add, however, that Thord would probably not approve of her designation as “female hero” simply because her flesh had girl bits this time around. Aki’Drednanth all refer to themselves by the female pronoun precisely because they see no meaning or purpose in the distinction. Which, really, just makes them even more worthy of emulation in the case of this here Hugo issue.

  2. dreameling says:

    I only heard about this yesterday (mainly through Martin’s “Not A Blog”). Based on the reading I’ve been doing on both sides thus far, the Puppies resemble nothing so much as a group of bitter Perussuomalaiset convinced that there’s an evil leftist conspiracy to shut them out of government, which is the main reason why they’re not already the biggest (and, in a perfect world, only) party in the country, because clearly it’s them that the people really love, not the snobs in the other parties.

    Having said that, though, there is a point to be made about the cliquey tribal mentality of (parts of) Anglo-American SFF fandom. As far as I can tell from over here.

  3. aaronthepatriot says:

    Oh, I see the patriarchy has launched yet another assault on women, so typical of Hateboy’s Hatestand![1] How dare you promote your work, as a white male, when there are women out there whose work you AREN’T promoting! When will you give women a fair shake on your blog by supporting them fully at your own expense? When???

    No, but seriously, at the end of this I still couldn’t give a fuck about Hugo awards, as you did going in. There’s so many ways to see reviews and ratings of any work you are considering, these awards grow less and less important. Certainly in MY mind and upon MY reading habits, they do. I can’t remember the last time I was impressed by the “Hugo and Nebula award winner” label.

    You’re right about your books, and linza makes excellent points to bolster you. Once you cut out the clueless or non-heroic men, I think you have quite a good ratio of female heroes to male heroes. Well done!

    [1] I just came up with that today. Please tell me I’m the first. Lie, if you have to. I promise to turn my lie-o-meter off.[2]

    [2] OK that was a lie, but lie anyway if you must.

  4. Pingback: Interlude: Hugo Nominations | Hatboy's Hatstand

  5. Pingback: Bookmerc | Hatboy's Hatstand

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s